Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14339 (AP)

DOREPALLI ANIL SRINIVAS KUMAR v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/9050/2025 · 2025-04-07

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE / PRESENT jb THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.nIp WRIT PETITION NO: 9050 OF 2025 ^ I Between: 1. Dorepalli Anil Srinivas Kumar, S/o Dorepalli Durga Rao, Aged about years, R/o D.No.1-54, Tekkinavarigudem, Jangareddygudem Mandal, Andhra Pradesh. 37 Lakkavaram 2. Dorepall^^ Ramanjaneya Nagamani, W/o Dorepalli Durga Rao Aged lannIr HH D Tekkinavarigudem LakkavarL Jangareddygudem Mandal, Andhra Pradesh. 3. Dorepalli Durga Rao, S/o Dorepalli Mukkaiah D.No.1-54, Tekkinavarigudem, Lakkavaram Andhra Pradesh. , Aged about 67 years, R/o Jangareddygudem Mandal ...Petitioners AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh PrI. Secretary Home Department, Secretariat Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent Of Police, Eluru District , Eluru EilTru^'"' Pol'®*. Jangareddygudem , Eluru District, 4. The Circle Inspector, Jangareddygudem Circle 5. The Station House Officer, Lakkavaram Police Jangareddygudem Mandal, Eluru District. 6. Mallelli Nataniyelu, Aged about 58 years, S/o Yesubakthu Tekkinavarigudem Jangareddygudem Mandal, Eluru District. 7. Yadia Ramesh, Aged about 31 years, S/o Not Known R/o SsWct Jangareddygudem ’ Jangareddygudem. Station, Lakkavaram, Mandal, Eluru ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court be pleased to issue Order Direction may more particularly one in the nature of -Writ Of Mandamus declare the action of the 4*'" and 5*^ respondents in involving in Civil Disputes and threatening to implicate in False Cases against thd petitioners if they did not sign fresh agreement of sale in favor of 6th respondent for the land covered in R.S.No.530/4 an extent of 0.04 Cents approximately situated in Lakkavaram Revenue Village, Jangareddygudem Mandal as illegal, arbitrary and not part of their job and consequently direct the respondents 4 and 5 not to involve in civil cases R.S.No.530/4 an extent of 0.04 Cents approximately situated in Lakkavaram Revenue Village, Jangareddygudem Mandal. lA NO: 1 OF 207^ Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the police not to call the petitioners to Lakkavaram Station in civil matters for the land covered in R.S.No.530/4 an extent of 0.04 Cents approximately situated in Lakkavaram Revenue Village, Jangareddygudem Mandal, pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI J RAVI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following order: Police APHC010176312025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) ■ w [3457] 0™ MONDAY ,THE SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 9050/2025 Between: Dorepalli Anil Srinivas Kumar and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The State Of Ap and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1.J RAVI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent{S): 1.GP FOR HOME t The Court made the following Order: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for the respondent Nos.1 to 5. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the 5 respondent at behest of respondent Nos.6 and 7 are interfering in the civil disputes and threatening the petitioners to implicate them in false cases, if they do not sign fresh agreement sale in respect of 6"^ respondent for land covered in R.S.No.530/4 to the extent of Ac.0.04 cents. It is submitted that the th 2 S' mother and the 2^^ petitioner has executed paper to sell 0.02 cents approximately to the 6 with a time limit of two months and that the 6 an agreement of sale on a white th respondent on 03.09.2021 th respondent could not get the sale deed registered. At behest of respondent Nos.6 and 7, the 5 th respondent IS now pressuring the petitioners to enter into fresh respondent Nos.6 and 7. agreement with the 3. Considering the submissions, the respondent is directed not to disturb the peace of the petitioners and also not to interfere disputes between the petitioners and the respondent Nos.6 and following due process of law. into the civil 7. without With the above observations, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. 4. 5. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pendjng, if any, shall //TRUE COPY// Sd/- M. SRINIVAS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR stand closed. To. SECTION OFFICER 1. The PrI. Secretary, Home Department, State of Andhra Pradesh secretariat Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent Of Police. Eluru District, Eluru ^ Elum^^ Superintendent of Police, Jangareddygudem, Eluru District, 4. The Circle Inspector, Jangareddygudem Circle Jangareddygudem. 5. The Station House Officer, Lakkavaram Police Station Jangareddygudem Mandal, Eluru District. 6. One CC to Sri J Ravi Kumar, Advocate [OPUC] 7. Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. 8. Two CD Copies , Lakkavaram, [OUT] RAM RAM HIGH COURT DATED:07/04/2025 ORDER WP.No.9050 of 2025 f? 08AWM25 Gurfeni ^aectson % o •k 1.4 <r,0 1*^ r,T DISPOSING OF THE WP WITHOUT COSTS