VIJAY KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. AGRI. MARKETING AND AGRI. FOREIGN TRADE, LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/6585/2025 · 2025-09-09
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 143382 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 143382 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 6585 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. Order on Application
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties.
2. Petition had earlier been filed challenging orders dated 02.04.2024 and 03.04.2024 passed by opposite parties as well as seeking a direction to opposite parties to allot petitioner the work of driver and pay honourarium.
3. It has been submitted that petition has been rendered infructuous.
4. For reasons indicated in the affidavit filed in support of the application, the application is allowed and the petition is dismissed as not pressed without any adverse effects upon benefits already granted to petitioner. September 9, 2025 kvg/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manish Jauhari, Saksham Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Vijay Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Agri. Marketing And Agri. Foreign Trade, Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench