Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 143376 (MAD)

A.M. Adaikkan v. The Commissioner of Land Administration

WP(MD)/16015/2025 · 2025-09-17

Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 17.09.2025 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY W.P.(MD)No.16015 of 2025 A.M.Adaikkan ...Petitioner Vs 1.The Commissioner of Land Administration, Office of the Commissioner of Land Administration, Ezhilagam, Chennai. 2.The Registrar of Co-Operative Societies, N.V.Natarajan Maligai, 170, E.V.R.Periyar Road, Kilpauk, Chennai - 600 010. 3.The District Collector, District Collector Campus, Pudukottai. 4.The District Revenue Officer, Office of the District Revenue Officer, Pudukottai. 5.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Iluppur Taluk, Pudukottai District. 6.The Thasildar, Taluk Office, Ponnamaravathi Taluk, Pudukottai District. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 7.The Secretary, Valayapatti Kandiyanatham Metal Works Industrial Co-Operative Society, Ponnamaravathi Taluk, Pudukottai District. ...Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 6 to issue patta to the petitioner in Survey No.155/4 to an extent of 0.26.00 ares and in Survey No. 155/5 to an extent of 49.50 Ares of lands in Ponnamaravathi East, Ponnamaravathi Taluk, Pudukottai District after collecting the cost of lands from the petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr.D.Senthil For Respondents : Mr.K.Balasubramani Special Government Pleader for R1 to R6 ORDER By asserting that the land in S.No.155/4 of an extent of 0.26.00 ares and the land in S.No.155/5 of an extent of 49.50 ares were owned by the 7th respondent Society and that such Society became defunct in the year 1975, the petitioner submitted representations seeking issuance of patta in respect of the above mentioned lands of the said Society. Since such representations did not elicit a response, the present writ petition has been filed. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2.Upon examining the affidavit and the documents enclosed by the petitioner, it is clear that the petitioner has no right or entitlement in relation to the relevant property. In those circumstances, a mandamus as requested for by the petitioner cannot be granted. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed without any order as to costs. 17.09.2025 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes/No RJR 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY , J. RJR To 1. The Commissioner of Land Administration, Office of the Commissioner of Land Administration, Ezhilagam, Chennai. 2.The Registrar of Co-Operative Societies, N.V.Natarajan Maligai, 170, E.V.R.Periyar Road, Kilpauk, Chennai - 600 010. 3. The District Collector, District Collector Campus, Pudukottai. 4. The District Revenue Officer, Office of the District Revenue Officer, Pudukottai. 5. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Revenue Divisional Office, Iluppur Taluk, Pudukottai District. 6. The Thasildar, Taluk Office, Ponnamaravathi Taluk, Pudukottai District. W.P.(MD)No.16015 of 2025 17.09.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis