SHANTI SAMAJ SEVI SAMITI THRU. SECRETARY, MURLIDHAR GAUR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. WOMEN WELFARE LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIC/5383/2025 · 2025-06-06
Praveen Kumar Giri, Rajan Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 143372 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 143372 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:34797-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 5383 of 2025 Petitioner :- Shanti Samaj Sevi Samiti Thru. Secretary, Murlidhar Gaur Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Women Welfare Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kaushal Kishore Tewari,Shakti,Sharad Trivedi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Praveen Kumar Giri,J. Heard. The petitioner has challenged an internal communication between the Managing Director of U.P. Mahila Kalyan Nigam with the District Probation Officer, Farrukhabad regarding a proposed recovery from 27 institutions including the petitioner. In fact, the recovery from the other institutions has been made, but the recovery from the petitioner has not been affected, therefore, a request has been made for the same. However, no citation of recovery has been issued as yet. In our opinion, unless a citation of recovery is issued by the revenue authorities or any other officer addressed to the petitioner, a cause of action will not arise. The question as to whether the money could be recovered as arrears of land revenue would be considered accordingly, at the appropriate stage. The petitioner may, however, if he has a cause, represent to the concerned authorities against the proposed recovery which can be considered by them. The writ petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. Order Date :- 6.6.2025 Lokesh Kumar [Praveen Kumar Giri, J.] [Rajan Roy, J.] Digitally signed by :- LOKESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench