HAMID AHMAD ANSARI v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE COURT ROOM NO. 22 LUCKNOW and ORS.
WRIA/1000166/2011 · 2025-05-02
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 143351 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 143351 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:25456 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1000166 of 2011 Petitioner :- Hamid Ahmad Ansari Respondent :- Additional District Judge Court Room No. 22 Lucknow And Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Brijesh Kumar Saxena,Amit Srivastava,Humayun Mirza,Shafiq Mirza Counsel for Respondent :- Rakesh Pandey Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
1. No one appears on behalf of the petitioner even in the revised call.
2. The present petition has been filed against the
order whereby the release application was rejected and the appeal was also dismissed.
3. Considering the fact that U.P. Act No. XIII of 1972 has been repealed, the present petition is
disposed of permitting the petitioner to file fresh proceedings, if so advised, under the Tenancy Act of 2021. In case, a fresh proceedings are filed, the same shall be decided within the time prescribed in the statute. The order impugned in the present petition shall not come in the way in deciding the application on its own merits in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 2.5.2025 Arun Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench