Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 143316 (ALL)

SRI SUDAMA KUMAR SAITA v. GAGAN GURNANI

SCCR/16/2019 · 2025-07-30

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:44162 Court No. - 7 Case :- S.C.C. REVISION No. - 16 of 2019 Revisionist :- Sri Sudama Kumar Saita Opposite Party :- Gagan Gurnani Counsel for Revisionist :- Ritesh Kumar Srivastava,Brijesh Kumar,Ravi Shanker Tewari,Vishwakant Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- Umesh Kumar Tiwari Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J. 1. Heard learned counsels for the parties. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the revisionist very clearly states that some reasonable time be granted to vacate the premises, in which, counsel for opposite party has no objection. 3. In view thereof, the present revision is disposed of. 4. However, it is stated that revisionist shall not be evicted from the premises in question upto 31.07.2026 subject to, the revisionist execute an undertaking in the form of written affidavit before the Small Causes Court within a period of three weeks from today, undertaking to vacate the premises and to handover the physical and vacant possession to the respondent- landlord and to no one else. Order Date :- 30.7.2025 Praveen Digitally signed by :- PRAVEEN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench