ANIL KUMAR GUPTA v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE /FTC COURT NO.7 HARDOI
A227/1001034/2011 · 2025-04-11
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 143313 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 143313 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:20678 Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1001034 of 2011 Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Gupta Respondent :- Additional District Judge /Ftc Court No.7 Hardoi Counsel for Petitioner :- A.Z.Siddiqui,Anoop Kumar Upadhyay,Neeraj Sahu Counsel for Respondent :- Manish Kumar,Amresh Singh,Shitla Prasad Tripathi Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the order dated 05.05.2010, whereby the impleadment application was allowed in a suit as well as the order dated 02.12.2010 whereby the revision preferred was dismissed.
3. From the perusal of the revisional order, it transpires that three persons had claimed rights over the same property by virtue of a sale deed, which according to the Court had common boundaries and in that context, the Court had allowed the impleadment application. No fault can be found with the said orders.
4. As the suit is of the year 2006, the present petition is disposed of with direction to decide the suit expeditiously within a period of one year. Office of this Court shall transmit a copy of the
order to the Court where the Regular Suit no. 111 of 2006 is pending.
Order Date :- 11.4.2025 Arun Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench