Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14329 (GAU)

MARU TARO v. MRIDUL DEORI AND ANR.

I.A.(Civil)/1958/2025 · 2025-09-16

Susmita Phukan Khaund

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010129452025 2025:GAU-AS:12818 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/1958/2025 MARU TARO SON OF MARU TAKIA, RESIDENT OF BACKSIDE AKASHDEEP, P/S. ITANAGAR, DIST. PAPUM PARE, ARUNACHAL PRADESH-791111 VERSUS MRIDUL DEORI AND ANR. SON OF MILON DEORI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE GAI DEORI, P/S. SILAPATHAR, DIST. DHEMAJI, ASSAM-787057. 2:MON BAHADUR DORJEE SON OF HORKA BAHADUR DORJEE RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BEDATI P/S. BEHALI DIST. BISWANTH CHARIALI ASSAM-78417 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR P BHARDWAJ, MR G PHUKAN Advocate for the Respondent : MR A KHANIKAR (R-1), MR B DEORI (R-1),MR G BHARADWAJ (R-1) BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND ORDER Date : 17-09-2025 Learned counsel Mr. M. Rahman is present for the applicant. Learned counsel Mr. A. Khanikar is present for the respondent No. 1. Page No.# 2/2 2. Service report on respondent No. 2 is awaited. 3. It is submitted that the respondent No. 2 did not contest the proceeding before the Tribunal. 4. Learned counsel for the respondent No. 1 has no objection if the delay is condoned. 5. It is submitted on behalf of the applicant that there is no malafide on behalf of the applicant. It is submitted that owing to health issues, the applicant could not file the connected appeal within the period of limitation. 6. Considering all aspects, the delay is condoned. 7. Registry to register the connected appeal. 8. While listing the connected appeal, Registry to reflect the name of learned counsel for respondent No. 1 in the cause list. 9. In terms of the above observation, this I.A. stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant