1 / 3 2025:CGHC:15185 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2116 of 2025 1 - Panchram Salaame S/o Shri Kanhaiyalal Salaame Aged About 44 Years R/o Ward No. 13 Irrigation Colony Q.No. G-7B, Amapara Balod District Balod (Chhattisgarh) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Revenue And Disaster Management Department Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, Distt. Raipur, (C.G.) Pin-492001 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Deputy Secretary, Revenue And Disaster Management Department Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, Distt. Raipur, (C.G.). Pin- 492001 3 - The Commissioner, Durg, Division Durg District Durg (C.G.) 4 - The Collector, Durg, District Durg, (Chhattisgarh) ... Respondents (Cause title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Dheerendra Pandey, Advocate For Respondents/ State : Ms. Akanksha Verma, Panel Lawyer 2 / 3 (HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE BIBHU DATTA GURU) Order on Board 01/04/2025 1. By the present writ petition, the petitioner, who is working on the post of Tahsildar, is questioning the transfer order dated 10.03.2023 (Annexure P-1) by which the petitioner has been transferred from District Durg to District Bijapur. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is questioning the transfer order stating that his wife is working as a teacher and posted at district Balod. He submits that due to transfer of the petitioner to Bijapur from the present place of posting, the entire family of the petitioner has been destabilized. He would further submit that the petitioner has worked maximum part of his service tenure in scheduled area and hence again the transfer of the petitioner to a scheduled area is contrary to the policy of the State Government. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents/ State on instructions, submits that, as far as, the transfer of employees of the State government is concerned, the State government has decided to constitute a committee to consider the grievance of the employees in case of transfer. He further submits that if the petitioner will approach the said committee, the committee will decide the same in accordance with law and the relevant transfer policy. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents. 3 / 3 5. Looking to the grievance of the petitioner, it is directed that the petitioner shall approach the committee constituted vide order dated 03.03.2025 by filing a representation within a period of 5 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. In case of filing of such representation, the said committee shall decide the representation of the petitioner in accordance with law and the relevant transfer policy, within a period of 15 days from the date of filing of such representation. 6. It is made clear that till the decision of the Committee, status quo, with regard to the posting of the petitioner, be maintained by both the parties. 7. The petitioner is at liberty to apprise the Committee with regard to the order passed by this court. 8. With the aforesaid direction, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (BIBHU DATTA GURU) JUDGE $. Bhilwar