SHAILENDRA KUMAR PATHAK @ SHAILENDRA PATHAK v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME LKO. AND OTHERS
CRLP/4856/2025 · 2025-06-03
Rajesh Singh Chauhan, Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 143277 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 143277 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:34405-DB
Court No. - 9 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 4856 of 2025 Petitioner :- Shailendra Kumar Pathak @ Shailendra Pathak Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ankit Dubey,Dushyant Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. Hon'ble Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra,J.
1. Heard Sri Ankit Dubey, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State/opposite parties and perused the record. 2. This petition seeks issuance of direction in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned F.I.R. dated 17.5.2025 bearing FIR/Case Crime No. 0251 of 2025, for the offence under Section 351(3) and 303(2) of Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita (BNS), 2023, registered at Police Station Kadipur, District Sultanpur. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the offences as alleged in FIR have maximum punishment for the term less than seven years imprisonment, whereas, the police is trying to arrest him, which is against the mandates of Code of Criminal Procedure. 4. Additional Government Advocate appearing for respondent State has given a statement on behalf of investigating agency that because the offence allegedly committed by the petitioner, entails sentence of less than seven years, provisions of Section 35(3) Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 shall be strictly followed in terms of judgments rendered by Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in the cases reported in (2014) 8 SCC 273: Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar and another and Satender Kumar Antil vs. CBI and another in Special Leave to Appeal (Criminal) No. 5191 of 2021 : (2022) 10 SCC 51. 5. Considering the stand of the investigating agency, learned counsel for the petitioner states that let this petition be disposed of in view of the above said facts. 6. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of in view of the provisions of Section 35(3) Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, and the law as laid down by Apex Court in the
case of Arnesh Kumar (supra) and Satender Kumar Antil (supra). 7. However, It is directed that the petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer of the concerned police station on 10.06.2025 at 11.00 a.m. sharp for the purpose to cooperate in the investigation. Thereafter, he shall continue to cooperate in the investigation till its completion, failing which, the protection of this order would not be available to him. .
[Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra, J.] [Rajesh Singh Chauhan, J.] Order Date :- 3.6.2025 Om Digitally signed by :- OM PRAKASH MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench