AJAY KUMAR PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO.
ABAIL/628/2025 · 2025-05-30
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 143264 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 143264 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:33399 Court No. - 13 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 628 of 2025 Applicant :- Ajay Kumar Pandey Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Santosh Kumar Tirpathi,Surekha Patel,Virendra Singh Pal Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J.
1. Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record.
2. Heard learned counsel for applicant and learned Additional Government Advocate appearing on behalf of opposite party.
3. First Anticipatory Bail Application has been filed with regard to Case Crime no.384 of 2017, under Sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC, Police Station Alambagh, District Lucknow.
4. As per contents of first information report, applicant is one of the Directors of Company, namely, Peers Allied Corporation which illegally portrayed itself as Non Banking Management Financial Corporation without due authorization of Reserve Bank of India and floated various monetary scheme whereby it usurped the money of investment. The applicant is shown as Director in the Company.
5. It has been submitted that applicant has been falsely implicated in allegations levelled against him which would be evident from the fact that applicant has already resigned as Director of the Company in the year 2013 whereas allegation levelled are subsequent thereto.
6. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail application with submission that applicant is not cooperating in investigation due to which not only non bailable warrants but also proceedings under Section 82 Cr.P.C.have been initiated against applicant.
7. Upon consideration of submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties and perusal of material on record, prima facie, it appears that applicant is not cooperating during investigation leading to process under Section 82 Cr.P.C.
8. In such circumstances, this Court does not find any good ground to grant any indulgence granting liberty to applicant to apply regular bail, which shall be considered expeditiously.
9. Applications stands disposed of. Order Date :- 30.5.2025 Renu/- Digitally signed by :- RENU AGARWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench