Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 143252 (ALL)

ROHIT YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

NABAIL/570/2025 · 2025-09-08

Subhash Vidyarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 570 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Shri Mohd. Nafees, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Ashok Kumar Srivastava, learned A.G.A. for the State and Shri Shanker Lal Verma, learned counsel for the complainant. 2. After arguing the matter at some length, the learned counsel for the applicant restricted his prayer for giving him an opportunity to file an application for bail. 3. In view of the aforesaid request, the instant application is disposed of leaving it open to the applicant to file an application for grant of bail and in case such an application is filed, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another: (2022) 10 SCC 51. September 8, 2025 S. Shivhare Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mohd. Nafees, Pawan Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Abhishek Singh, Ajay Rajput, Shailesh Kumar Srivastava, Shanker Lal Verma, Vijay Rajput (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Rohit Yadav .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- SHASHANK SHIVHARE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench