SONI AND 5 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. URBAN DEVELOPMENT LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIC/5415/2025 · 2025-06-04
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 143248 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 143248 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:34459-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 5415 of 2025 Petitioner :- Soni And 5 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Urban Development Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Hari Krishna Srivastava,Mohan Lal Sahu,Surendra Kumar Tripathi,Sweta Swarankar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Namit Sharma Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Praveen Kumar Giri,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Shri Shailendra Singh Chauhan, learned counsel for respondent No.2.
2. The petitioners have prayed the following relief:-
"i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus thereby commanding the Opposite parties not to interfere in peaceful running of petitioners shop which was allotted to them in Vending Zone, 6 P.S.P.G.I., Rae Bareilly Road, District- Lucknow, as per their authorization letter issued by competent authority of Opposite party No.2 in favour of the petitioners."
3. Learned counsel for the Nagar Nigam says that the petitioners were required to do vending on the nahar patri, but they encroached and conduct their business on the main road. Further, the license fees have not been deposited by them after
2023.
4. On being confronted as regards the fees, the petitioners could not satisfy us, that the same has been paid after 2023.
5. In any case, these all are factual disputes, which cannot be seen in a writ jurisdiction. If the petitioners have any cause, they may avail other remedies as may be prescribed in law.
6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. (Praveen Kumar Giri, J.) (Rajan Roy, J.) Order Date :- 4.6.2025 Ashutosh Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench