Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14320 (KAR)

M. THIRTHAPPA v. SHIVAMOGGA BHADRAVATHI URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

WP/2519/2025 · 2025-03-17

S Sunil Dutt Yadav

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:11018 WP No. 2519 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 2519 OF 2025 (LB-RES) BETWEEN: M. THIRTHAPPA, S/O MARUTHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, R/AT NO.5, 1ST CROSS, SLT LAYOUT, OPP: MAX PURNODAYA, KUVEMPU NAGAR, SAVALANGA ROAD, SHIVAMOGGA - 577 201. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. G. BALAKRISHNA SHASTRY, ADVOCATE) AND: SHIVAMOGGA BHADRAVATHI URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER, SHIVAMOGGA - 577 201. …RESPONDENT THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT TO CONSIDER THE OBJECTIONS/ REPRESENTATIONS SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER ON 05.10.23 AS PER ANNX-A AND CONSIDER THE CASE OF THE PETITIONER FOR CONFIRMING THE ALLOTMENT MADE IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER UNDER THE STATE GOVERNMENT. Digitally signed by PRAKASH N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:11018 WP No. 2519 of 2025 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV ORAL ORDER Memo for withdrawal has been filed which reads as hereunder: "The counsel for the Petitioner humbly submits that the top noted Writ Petition is filed seeking direction to the respondent to consider the objection/representation submitted by the Petitioner to the Respondent on 05.10.2023 as per Annexure - A and to consider the case of the Petitioner for confirming the allotment made in his favour under the state government quota. It is humbly submitted subsequent to the filing of the Writ Petition, the Respondent authority has considered the objection/representation dated 05.10.2023 and has cancelled the allotment of site to the Petitioner. Hence it is humbly prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to permit the Petitioner to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file fresh Petition challenging the order of cancellation of allotment in the interest of Justice and Equity." - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:11018 WP No. 2519 of 2025 The same is taken on record. In light of the said submission and memo filed, petition is dismissed as not pressed. Liberty is reserved for the petitioner to file a fresh writ petition on the same cause of action as well as in light of the subsequent facts. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE DHA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4 CT: BHK