Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 143192 (ALL)

DINESH KUMAR YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE GOVT. LKO AND 4 OTHERS

/5425/2025 · 2025-09-12

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 5425 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent(s) and perused the material brought on record. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer: "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties to remove the encroachment over the land gata no.1258 and 157, which is situated at Village Saraiya Bharthi, Pargana Barausa, Tehsil Baldirai, District Sultanpur recorded as chakmarg and manure pit respectively by constituting a coordinated team for meticulous paimaish (demarcation) taking measurement from one boundary to boundary so as to avoid anu ambiguity." 3. Learned Standing Counsel, based upon instructions states that in respect of one of the Gatas, the proceedings under Section 67 of the U.P Revenue Code have been initiated and in respect of the other gata, a notice has already been served. 4. In view of the said statement, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to the authority concerned to conclude the aforesaid proceedings with all expedition within the time, as prescribed in the statute i.e. 90 days, in accordance with law. September 12, 2025 Praveen Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kirti Bhushan Mishra, P.R.S. Bajpai Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Dinesh Kumar Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Govt. Lko And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRAVEEN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench