AMRIT LAL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/6488/2025 · 2025-06-04
Abdul Moin
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 143189 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 143189 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:34536 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6488 of 2025 Petitioner :- Amrit Lal Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sarvesh Kumar,Pinki Devi,Shivani Raj,Shri Prakash Verma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents.
2. With the consent of learned counsels appearing for the contesting parties, the writ petition is finally being disposed of.
3. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that despite the petitioner having retired on 31.06.2019 from the post of Lekpal, the amount of Gratuity has still not been paid to him.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing the matter at some length, prays that in this regard he may be permitted to submit a comprehensive representation to the respondent No.2 for redressal of his grievances and the respondent No.2 be
directed to consider the same in accordance with law within a specified time to which learned counsels for the respondents have no objection.
5. Accordingly, liberty is granted to the petitioner to submit a comprehensive representation for the redressal of his grievances pertaining to his grievance within a period of two weeks from today before the respondent No.2, who may consider the grievance of the petitioner in accordance with rules and shall
endeavour to decide the representation by means of a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law and relevant rules within a further period of six weeks from the date of submission of the representation along with the certified copy of this order.
6. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of.
7. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the claim set forth by the petitioner.
Order Date :- 4.6.2025 S. Shivhare Digitally signed by :- SHASHANK SHIVHARE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench