Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 143184 (ALL)

KHALIL AHMAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 10 OTHERS

WRIC/5347/2025 · 2025-06-06

Praveen Kumar Giri, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:34785-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 5347 of 2025 Petitioner :- Khalil Ahmad Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 10 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Praveen Kumar Giri,J. Heard. The petitioner wants access to his house. A writ petition is not the remedy. Easementary rights can neither be claimed nor enforced in a writ petition. The petitioner should avail other remedies, as may be prescribed in law. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. Order Date :- 6.6.2025 Lokesh Kumar [Praveen Kumar Giri, J.] [Rajan Roy, J.] Digitally signed by :- LOKESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench