MOHD FAROOQ AND OTHERS v. U T OF J AND K TH COMMISSIONER SECRETARY HOME DEPTT AND OTHERS
CRM(M)/328/2023 · 2025-11-07
Rajnesh Oswal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14316 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14316 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CRM(M) No. 328/2023
Mohd. Farooq and others …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) )
Through: None.
vs
U. T. of J&K and others .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Eishan Dadhichi, GA
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE
ORDER 07.11.2025
1. There was no representation on behalf of the petitioners for the last two consecutive dates of hearing. Same is the position today also. It appears that the petitioners have lost interest in prosecuting the present petition. As such, the same is dismissed for non prosecution.
(RAJNESH OSWAL)
JUDGE
Jammu 07.11.2025 Rakesh 40 Rakesh Kumar 2025.11.08 12:05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document