RAJKAMAL v. SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE TEHSIL KUNDA DISTRICT PRATAPGARH AND 2 OTHERS
WRIC/5253/2025 · 2025-06-03
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 143113 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 143113 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:34342-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 5253 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rajkamal Respondent :- Sub Divisional Magistrate Tehsil Kunda District Pratapgarh And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Saroj Neelu Omkar,Shiv Lal Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Praveen Kumar Giri,J.
1. Heard.
2. The petitioner admittedly claims that opposite party no.3 had been given a room in the house for living. The house has been constructed on land allotted to the petitioner on lease/ patta, as claimed. Now the opposite party no.3 is not vacating the room. This is not a matter to be adjudicated under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
3. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to pursue other remedy available to him as prescribed under law. . (Praveen Kumar Giri, J.) (Rajan Roy, J.) Order Date :- 3.6.2025 Arnima Digitally signed by :- ARNIMA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench