VINDHA DEEN MISHRA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. PANCHAYATIRAJ DEPTT. LKO. AND 8 OTHERS
WRIC/5387/2025 · 2025-06-06
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 143112 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 143112 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:34800-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 5387 of 2025 Petitioner :- Vindha Deen Mishra Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Panchayatiraj Deptt. Lko. And 8 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Gauri Shankar Maurya Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Gupta Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Praveen Kumar Giri,J. Heard. Learned Standing Counsel has instructions that the earlier report dated 02.02.2023 was not satisfactory, therefore, another enquiry was ordered by the District Magistrate, and the report has been submitted on 21.02.2025 wherein out of the 379 beneficiaries, the benefit was actually extended to only 168, and now, further action is to be taken in the matter. However, the instructions do not throw any light on the report dated 02.02.2023, annexed as part of Annexure No. 5, except to say that no financial irregularity was found in the said report. Be that as it may, if the aforesaid exercise has been undertaken on the complaint of the petitioner, then the District Magistrate shall take the proceedings to their logical conclusion at the earliest. If nothing happens in the next two months, it shall be open for the petitioner to approach this Court again. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. Order Date :- 6.6.2025 Lokesh Kumar [Praveen Kumar Giri, J.] [Rajan Roy, J.] Digitally signed by :- LOKESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench