N CHAITANYA v. PRL.SECY., MA &UD DEPT., GUN., & ANOTHER,
WP/33301/2017 · 2025-07-30
Harinath N
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14311 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14311 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010177112017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 33301/2017 Between:
1. N CHAITANYA, S/O LALITHA PRASAD, AGED ABOUT YEARS, R/ O 59-5-1A, ASHOK NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA.
...PETITIONER AND
1. PRL SECY MA UD DEPT GUN
ANOTHER, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION 86 URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AT VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. A P CAPITAL REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER, VIJAYAWADA.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the proceedings bearing Rc.No.CRDA12021/ 1/2017, dated .9.2017 issued by the respondent No.2 as illegal and violative of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India besides being in violation of Doctrine of principles of natural, declaring that the petitioner is entitled for the refund of the amount and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP 41421 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the proceedings bearing Rc.No. CRDA-12021/ 1/ 2017, dated .9.2017 issued by the respondent No.2, pending final disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. VAJJHALA SATYANARAYANA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP-MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP)
2
The Court made the following Order:
In view of the letter dated 28.07.2025 addressed to the Registry, by Mr.V.Satyanarayana Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeking permission of this Court for withdrawal of the Writ Petition, the matter is listed today under the caption “For Withdrawal”.
2. Permission is accorded.
3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as Withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
4. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
______________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date : 31.07.2025 BMS