VISHWASH KUMAR VISHWAKARMA v. TEHSILDAR,TEHSIL JALALPUR,DISTRICT AMBEDKAR NAGAR AND 2 OTHERS
A227/3481/2025 · 2025-05-30
Saurabh Lavania
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 143095 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 143095 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:33339 Court No. - 7 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3481 of 2025 Petitioner :- Vishwash Kumar Vishwakarma Respondent :- Tehsildar,Tehsil Jalalpur,District Ambedkar Nagar And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Brijesh Kumar Verma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. At the very outset, learned Counsel for the petitioner stated that inadvertently the proper necessary opposite party could not be arrayed in the memo of petition and as such he may be permitted to implead the proper opposite party. Learned State Counsel has no objection to the prayer made by the learned Counsel for the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is permitted to implead the necessary opposite party during the course of the day. In view of order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the private-respondent(s) is hereby dispensed with. The present petition has been filed, seeking following main relief:-
"to, direct the opposite party no.1, to decide the restoration application and substitution application moved by the petitioner (annexed as annexure no. 2 &3 to the petition), in the case no. RST/02932/2018, computerized case no. T201804040202932, (Sharda Devi vs Surendra Pratap Singh), u/s 34, U.P. Land Revenue Code, 2006, pending before the opposite party no.1 (Tehsildar, Tehsil-Jalalpur, District Ambedkar Nagar), with in stipulated time fixed by this Hon'ble Court. Taking note of the fact that recall application as also substitution application in mutation case is pending since 2018 and also that the case related to mutation of name(s) in revenue records should be decided expeditiously, being summary in nature, the present petition is disposed of with direction to the respondent No.-1 to conclude the proceedings, after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment, preferably within three months from the next date fixed before it, if there is no other legal impediment in this regard. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 30.5.2025 Jyoti/- Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench