IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3293 of 2024 ------ 1. Vijay Kumar Singh @ Nabu Singh, aged about 65 years, s/o late Yodharam Singh, r/o Vill-Chitami, P.O.-Ghatiyali, P.S.-Pindrajora, Dist.-Bokaro, Jharkhand 2. Maniklal Mandal @ Manik Mandal, aged about 38 years, s/o Ratan Mandal, r/o Vill-Chitami, P.O.-Ghatiyali, P.S.- Pindrajora, Dist.-Bokaro, Jharkhand 3. Abinash Singh, aged about 29 years, s/o Janardan Singh, r/o Village-Kaduagoda, P.O.-Ghatiyali, P.S.-Pindrajora, Dist.-Bokaro, Jharkhand 4. Sandeep Kumar Mahto @ Sandeep Mahato, aged about 26 years, s/o Plak Dhari Mahato, r/o Vill-Chitami (Bhandardih), P.O.-Ghatiyali, P.S.-Pindrajora, Dist.-Bokaro, Jharkhand 5. Madhusudan Mahato, aged about 30 years, s/o Govind Prasad Mahto, r/o Vill-Sonabad, P.O.-Ghatiyali, P.S.- Pindrajora, Dist.-Bokaro, Jharkhand … Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Kalipad Mahato, aged about 40 years, s/o Bhikhan Mahato, r/o Vill-Purandih, P.O.-Kura, P.S.-Pindrajora, Dist.-Bokaro, Jharkhand … Opposite Parties ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : None For the State : None ------ Order No.09 Dated- 20.02.2025 No one turns up on behalf of the parties in-spite of repeated calls. Apprehending their arrest, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Pindrajora P.S. Case No.317 of 2023 registered under sections 341/323/325/307/379/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Perusal of the record reveals that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons attempted to murder the informant- Kalipad Mahato and snatched away the gold chain and mobile phone. It is further averred in the anticipatory bail application that the allegations against the petitioners are all false and there is no injury report to support the contention of the informant of having sustained any injury. It is also averred in the anticipatory bail application that the informant used to extort money from tractor owners and there was enmity between the informant and the petitioners and the informant used to demand extortion and because of non-fulfilment of the same, this false case has been foisted. It is also averred in the anticipatory bail application that the petitioners are ready and willing to abide by any terms and condition as imposed by this Court. Considering the aforesaid facts of the case, I am of the opinion that it is a fit case where the abovenamed petitioners be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Hence, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, they shall be released on bail on depositing cash security of Rs. 10,000/- each and on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1st Class, Bokaro, in connection with Pindrajora P.S. Case No.317 of 2023 with the condition that the petitioners will cooperate with the investigation of the case and appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will furnish their mobile numbers and a copy of their Aadhar Cards in the court below with the undertaking that they will not change their mobile numbers during the pendency of the case with further condition that they will not annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during the pendency of the case subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Sonu/Gunjan-