Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:33945 Court No. - 18 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6436 of 2025 Petitioner :- Anil Raj Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Excise Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Birendra Kumar Yadav,Amit Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. 2. Learned Standing Counsel, on the basis of instructions, has submitted that the representation pending against the impugned punishment order dated 12.05.2020 has been decided. However, the revisional order has not been assailed by the petitioner. He submits that the petitioner has an alternative statutory remedy to challenge the impugned punishment order as well as the revisional order before the State Public Services Tribunal. 3. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed on the ground of availability of an alternative statutory remedy. In case the claim petition is filed by the petitioner before the State Public Services Tribunal within a period of two weeks from today, the same shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law. Order Date :- 30.5.2025 Madhu D.R/P.S Digitally signed by :- MADHU KUMARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench