Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 143016 (ALL)

ANIL KUMAR GUPTA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/5457/2025 · 2025-06-06

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:34861-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 5457 of 2025 Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Gupta Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinay Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Praveen Kumar Giri,J. Heard Shri Vinay Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner is unable to demonstrate as to how and under which provision of law the sale proceeds arising from the sale of the stock seized during inspection could be released in his favour during pendnecy of the criminal case by this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, especially, in view of the provisions of Section 6A of the Essential Commodities Act. We, therefore, dismiss this writ petition with liberty to pursue other remedies as may be prescribed in law. . (Praveen Kumar Giri,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Order Date :- 6.6.2025 R.K.P. Digitally signed by :- RAJ KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench