IN TH 112 Anita Ran Sh. Abhim Muktsar S CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU violation o ordinate Be Kumar an respondent senior offic seeking a with law.” Parvinder 19.6.2025 t COCP-6185-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR COCP No.6185 o Date of decision a Rani and another Versus Abhimanyuy Rana, Senior Super tsar Sahib and another AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI None for the petitioners. Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG Mr. Parvinder Singh, SI/SHO, Malout, District Sri Muktsar S HI GUPTA J. (Oral) Present contempt petition tion of order dated 28.5.2025 (Anne ate Bench of this Court in CRWP- ar and another vs. State of Punj ndent No.2-SSP, Sri Muktsar Sahib officer to look into the representatio g a report, he may pass an approp ” Learned counsel for the State inder Singh, SI/SHO, P.S. Malout in .2025 the petitioners had made a state 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 6185 of 2025 (O & M) cision :-14.01.2026 …..Petitioners Superintendent of Police, Sri …..Respondents E NIDHI GUPTA i, AAG Punjab assisted by /SHO, Police Station Sadar, ktsar Sahib. ition has been filed alleging (Annexure P-1) passed by a co- -5770-2025 titled as “Rajesh Punjab and others”, whereby Sahib was directed “to depute a tation (Annexure P-5) and after propriate order, in accordance e State, on instructions from Mr. lout informs this Court that on a statement before the SHO, P.S. VIJAY ASIJA 2026.01.15 18.48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Malout stat representat respondent petitioners handed ove by learned of the Crim is pointed thereafter o it is alleged No.2. Lear dated 23.12 has been re FIR has be Learned St and girl co Station Sad no represe interest of again taken on behalf o counsel fo contempt p COCP-6185-2025 (O & M) ut stating that they do not want any sentation submitted by the petition ndents vide order dated 01.7.2025. C ioners dated 19.6.2025 as well as cop ed over in the Court, which are taken arned counsel for the State that accor e Criminal Writ Court order dated 28. inted out that as stated in para 4 of after on 19.11.2025 that another incid alleged that parents of the girl had atta . Learned counsel submits that pursua 23.12.2025 under Sections 333, 324( een registered at Police Station Sadar has been handed over in the Court, ned State counsel, on instructions, fu girl concerned are not living in the on Sadar, Malout. Heard. When the case was called at i epresentation on behalf of the petitio est of justice, the matter was ordered taken up at 12:30 PM. Despite the s ehalf of the petitioners. In view of the submissions m sel for the State and the facts men empt petition is disposed of. 2 any protection. Accordingly, the etitioners was decided by the 25. Copy of the statement of the as copy of order dated 01.7.2025 taken on record. It is submitted accordingly there is no violation ted 28.5.2025 (Annexure P-1). It 4 of the contempt petition, it is r incident had taken place, where ad attacked on house of petitioner pursuant to the same FIR No.147 , 324(4), 191(3) and 190 of BNS Sadar, Malout. Copy of the said ourt, which is taken on record. ns, further informs that the boy in the jurisdiction of the Police ed at its serial number, there was petitioners. Accordingly, in the dered to be passed over and was e the second call, no one appears sions made on behalf of learned s mentioned above, the present VIJAY ASIJA 2026.01.15 18.48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document petitioners one month January 1 Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo COCP-6185-2025 (O & M) However, in case any caus ioners are at liberty to revive the prese onth from today. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, ary 14, 2026 r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No 3 cause of action survives, the present contempt petition within if any, shall stand(s) disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.01.15 18.48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document