Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14298 (KAR)

SRI C K SANGRAM SINGH v. MOHAMMED ISMAIL

RFA/168/2022 · 2025-01-25

Jyoti Mulimani

Review Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:3373 RFA No. 168 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 168 OF 2022 (SP) BETWEEN: SRI C.K.SANGRAM SINGH S/O LATE SRI.KRISHNA SINGH, AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, R/AT NO.58, 3RD MAIN ROAD, VYALIKAVAL, BANGALORE-560 003. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. M.SRIRAM REDDY., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. T.H.NARAYANA., ADVOCATE) AND: MOHAMMED ISMAIL S/O MOHAMMED HANEEF, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/AT JUNIGIRI STREET, SRIRANGAPATNA, MANDYA DISTRICT. AND ALSO AT NO.2031, 2ND PHASE, 2ND STAGE, RAJIV NAGAR, NEAR RING ROAD, MYSORE-570 009. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. M.J.ALVA., ADVOCATE) THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 READ WITH ORDER 41 RULE 1 OF THE CPC, 1908. THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:3373 RFA No. 168 of 2022 ORAL ORDER Sri.M.Sriram Reddy., counsel on behalf of Sri.T.H.Narayana., for the appellant and Sri.M.J.Alva., counsel fro the respondent have appeared in person. Counsel for the appellant submits that a memo has been filed and the same may be placed on record and the appeal may be disposed of in terms of the memo. When queried, counsel for the appellant submits that a conscious decision is taken by the advocate on record and the appellant about the disposal of the appeal in terms of the memo and if an order is passed, they shall not seek for recalling the same or file a review petition. The oral submission made by counsel for the appellant and the memo is placed on record. The Regular First Appeal is disposed of in terms of the memo. The Registry concerned is hereby directed to return the documents by replacing the same with Xerox copies. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:3373 RFA No. 168 of 2022 The Registry concerned is also directed to refund the Court fee as per the Karnataka Court Fee and Suits Valuation Act, 1958. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3