Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14294 (UTT)

PANKAJ NEGI v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPSS/2314/2023 · 2025-11-04

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPSS 2314/2023 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. K.K. Joshi, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Ganesh Datt Kandpal, Deputy AG, with Mr. Rajeev Singh Bisht, Additional CSC and Mr. Narayan Datt, Standing Counsel, for the State. Mr. Neeraj Garg, Advocate, for the respondent no. 6. Ms. Menka Tripathi, Advocate, for the respondent no. 7. (2) Mr. K.K. Joshi, learned Counsel for the petitioners, makes a statement at the bar that since the selection process is over, therefore, the relied claimed in the writ petition do not survive. (3) In view of the statement made by learned Counsel for the petitioner, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 4.11.2025 Pr