IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13580 of 2016 ====================================================== Ashok Kumar Singh S/o Late Babu Lal Singh Resident of Village- Chandar Bigha, P.O. P.S.- Barun, District- Aurangabad. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The Union Of India 2. The Divisional Railway Manager, East Central Railway, Mugalsarai Division, Mugalsarai. 3. The Chief Engineer Construction, East Central Railway, Mugalsarai Division, Mugalsarai. 4. The Collector, District- Aurangabad. 5. The District Land Acquisition Officer, District- Aurangabad. 6. Ram Kumar Singh S/o Late Lala Singh 7. Uday Singh s/o Late Lala Singh Respondents No.- 6 and 7 Residents of Village-Chandar Bigha, P.O. P.S.- Barun, District- Aurangabad. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr. Raj Kishore Roy, GP-18 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 2 28-07-2025 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner. 2. The present petition has been preferred for the grant of following relief(s): “(i) FOR issuance of appropriate Writ/Writs, Order/Orders, Direction/Directions commanding the Respondents concerned especially Respondent No. 5 to make 1/3rd payment of compensation amount to the Petitioner against acquisition of land bearing Patna High Court CWJC No.13580 of 2016(2) dt.28-07-2025 2/2 Khata No. 150, Khesra No. 1653, Area 1 Acre 88 Dec. situated in Mauza - Gobardhan Bigha, District - Aurangabad, which is being acquired for construction of Railway Yard by the Railways, in view of the fact that the said land was purchased by his uncle namely Ram Kumar Singh from the income of joint family property in his own name and the Petitioner has filed a Partition Suit No. 27 of 2016 before the court of learned Sub Judge I, Aurangabad and a mutual agreement has also been arrived in this regard on 26/07/2015, which have already been communicated to the Respondent No. -5. (ii) For any other relief/reliefs for which the petitioner is entitled under law.” 3. In the forenoon also there was no appearance on call, in that background, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. vinayak/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U