Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14293 (MAD)

LAKSHMANAN v. STATE REP BY

CRL OP/1425/2025 · 2025-03-03

Sunder Mohan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.O.P.No.1425 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 03.03.2025 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN Crl.O.P.No.1425 of 2025 Lakshmanan ... Petitioner Vs. The State represented by, The Inspector of Police, T-12 Poonamallee Police Station, Chennai. (Crime No.2559 of 2012). ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS, pleased to enlarge the petitioner on bail, in connection with the Crime No.2559 of 2012, pending investigation on the file of the respondent Police. For Petitioner : Mr.A.B.Ashok For Respondent : Mr.Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam Government Advocate (Crl.Side) O R D E R This Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 14.10.2024 seeking bail in S.C.No.473 of 2024 pending trial on the file of the learned III Additional Sessions Court, Tiruvallur, in connection with Crime No.2559 of 2012 registered 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.1425 of 2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 397, 395 read with Section 34 of IPC. 2. The petitioner is facing prosecution for the offence under Sections 397, 395 read with Section 34 of IPC. The petitioner was initially granted bail during the investigation. During the trial, for his non-appearance, a non-bailable warrant was issued on 14.10.2024 and the petitioner was arrested the same day through P.T. warrant. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that, the petitioner's non appearance is neither wilful nor wanton and in any case, petitioner is in custody from 14.10.2024 and he is ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prayed for grant of bail to the petitioner. 4. Per contra, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that, apart from this case, petitioner has sixty previous cases. 5. Considering the fact that the case is pending from the year 2012 without any progress due to the non appearance of the petitioner and also considering the fact that the petitioner has sixty previous cases, this Court is not 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.1425 of 2025 inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. 03.03.2025 Sma To 1. The Inspector of Police, T-12 Poonamallee Police Station, Chennai. 2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.1425 of 2025 SUNDER MOHAN., J. Sma Crl.O.P.No.1425 of 2025 03.03.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis