2025:JHHC:23016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No.2162 of 2021 1. Ramlal Mahato, aged about 56 years. 2. Mutuk Lal Mahato, aged about 73 years. Both are sons of Late Khoyna Mahato. 3. Rambrit Mahato, aged about 50 years, son of Chhedi Mahato. All are resident of Village Sukurhuttu, Niche Tola, Kanke, P.O. and P.S. Kanke, District Ranchi. …… Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Deputy Commissioner, Ranchi, having its office at Kutchhury, Ranchi, P.O. GPO, P.S. Kotwali, District Ranchi. 3. The Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Sadar Ranchi, having its office at Kutchhury, Ranchi, P.O. GPO, P.S. Kotwali, District Ranchi. 4. The Circle Officer, Kanke, P.O. and P.S. Kanke, District Ranchi. 5. The District Sub-Registrar, Ranchi, having its office at Kutchhury, Ranchi, P.O. GPO, P.S. Kotwali, District Ranchi. 6. Pitambar Mahato @ Charku Mahato, son of Foula Mahato, resident of Village Naya Saray, P.O. and P.S. Jagannathpur, District Ranchi. 7. Masomat Budhni Devi wife of Late Paran Mahato resident of Village Geswe, Mahadev Toli, P.O. and P.S. Burmu, District Ranchi. 8. Sanjiv Kumar Mahato son of Pres Kumar Mahato @ Prem Kumar Mahato. 9. Sanjiv Kumar Mahato son of Ram Jatan Mahato. 10. Manoj Kumar Mahato son of Dharamnath Mahato. SI. Nos. 8 to 10, all are residents of Village Sukurhuttu, P.O. and P.S. Kanke, District Ranchi. 11. Bisheshwar Mahato son of Sri Prem Kumar Mahato. 12. Sanjiv Kumar Mahato son of Sri Ram Jatan Mahato. 13. Manoj Kumar Mahato son of Sri Dharamnath Mahato. SI. Nos. 11 to 13, all residents of Village Sukurhuttu, P.O. and P.S. Kanke, District Ranchi. …... Respondents --------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR --------- For the Petitioners : Mr. Ashutosh Mishra, Advocate For the Resp.-State : Mr. K. K. Singh, S.C-V --------- - 1 - W.P.C No.2162 of 2021 2025:JHHC:23016 10/Dated: 11 th August, 2025 1. On instruction of the clients, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberty to work out his remedy in accordance with law. 2. Learned counsel for the State has no objection. 3. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. 4. Pending interlocutory application, if any, stands disposed of. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) Ravi-Chandan/- - 2 - W.P.C No.2162 of 2021