MOHIT RAWAT MINOR THRU. FATHER MAHESH KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. and ANR.
CRLR/597/2018 · 2025-08-26
Saurabh Lavania
Criminal Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 142922 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 142922 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 597 of 2018 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J.
1. Heard Shri Akhilendra Pratap Singh, Advocate holding brief of Shri Atul Verma, learned counsel for the revisionist, Shri Ajay Kumar Srivastava, learned A.G.A. for the State as well as perused the material placed on record.
2. This criminal revision seeking bail under Section 102 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 (in short "Act of 2015") has been filed against the judgment and order dated 08.05.2018, passed by the Sessions Judge, Barabanki in Criminal Appeal No.22 of 2018 (X Minor Juvenile Delinquent Vs. Sate of U.P. and others), which was preferred against the order dated 16.04.2018, passed by the Juvenile Justice Board, Barabanki (State of U.P. Vs. X Minor), arising out of Case Crime No.323 of 2017, under Section 377 I.P.C. & Section 3/4 of POCSO Act, Police Station- Lonikatra, District- Barabanki.
3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the revisionist stated at the bar that the present revision has been rendered infructuous and the same may be dismissed as such.
4. Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
5. Accordingly, the instant revision is dismissed as having become infructuous. August 26, 2025 Anand/- Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Rohit Kumar Singh, Atul Verma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Govt. Advocate (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Mohit Rawat Minor Thru. Father Mahesh Kumar .....Revisionist(s) State Of U.P. And Anr. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ANAND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench