Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CPSW No. 81/2016 in SWP No. 1826/2015
Ram Lal Bhatti
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Abirash Sharma, Advocate
vs
Shaleen Kabra, Secy. Education .…. Respondent(s)
Through: None
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAVED IQBAL WANI, JUDGE
ORDER 20.12.2025
1. Upon coming of the instant contempt petition for consideration,
learned counsel for the petitioner states that the respondents, in compliance of the order passed by this Court, have considered the case of the petitioner and rejected the same, which, as such, requires to be called in question.
2. Having regard to the aforesaid submission of counsel for the petitioner, the contempt proceedings shall stand closed with liberty to the petitioner to work out a remedy against the rejection of his claim, in case of availability of cause.
(Javed Iqbal Wani)
Judge
Jammu 20.12.2025 Vishal Sharma
Serial No. 15