Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14288 (RAJ)

REKHA W/O SHRI DHARAMRAJ BAIRWA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/4650/2025 · 2025-04-04

Praveer Bhatnagar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:15264] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4650/2025 Rekha W/o Shri Dharamraj Bairwa, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Sanod, Tehsil Nasirabad, District Ajmer. (At Present Confined In Judicial Custody In Central Jail Ajmer). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4651/2025 Dharamraj Bairwa S/o Shri Bhagchand Bairwa, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Awas Colony, Sanod, District Ajmer. (At Present Confined In Judicial Custody In Central Jail Ajmer). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Raj Kumar Goyal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Poonia, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 04/04/2025 1. These instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioners. The petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No.87/2025 registered at Police Station Nasirabad Sadar, District Ajmer for the offence(s) under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 110 and 3(5) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He [2025:RJ-JP:15264] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-4650/2025] further submits that the petitioners and the complainant have arrived at compromise and the accused-petitioner No.2 and the complainant are real brothers. The incident occurred in spur of moment and there was no intention on the part of the accused- petitioners to cause any injury to the complainant and no injuries were found to be dangerous to life. The complainant has also submitted an affidavit containing the fact that the petitioners and the complainant have arrived at compromise. The accused- petitioners are in custody since long and trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, these bail applications of the accused-petitioners may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed these bail applications. 4. Learned counsel for the complainant concedes that the petitioners and the complainant have arrived at amicable settlement and the complainant does not want to pursue with the prosecution and if the bail applications of the accused-petitioners are allowed, then the complainant has no objection. 5. Heard and perused the material available on record. 6. Considering the arguments advanced by the counsels for the parties and without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. 7. Accordingly, these bail applications under Section 483 BNSS are allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners namely: 1. Rekha W/o Shri Dharamraj Bairwa, 2. Dharamraj Bairwa S/o Shri Bhagchand Bairwa, in connection with FIR No.87/2025 registered at Police Station Nasirabad Sadar, District Ajmer, shall [2025:RJ-JP:15264] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-4650/2025] be enlarged on bail provided both of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/74-75