- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:3242 WP No. 13731 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 13731 OF 2017 (GM-BWSSB) BETWEEN: 1. PRAMUK TEMPLE MEADOWS APARTMENT OWNERS' ASSOCIATION ®, 27TH CROSS, BSK II STAGE, BANGALORE-560 070. REPRESENTED BY MS. MALA MURALIDHAR. 2. B.M.CASSIA APARTMENT OWNERS ASSOCIATION, BRIGADE MILLENNIUM, BANGALORE-560 078. REPRESENTED BY MR. RAGHAVENDRA B.S. 3. PURVA PARK OWNER'S ASSOCIATION NO.53 MSO COLONY, JEEVANAHALLI, BANGALORE-560 005. REPRESENTED BY MR.DEWAKAR RATHNAM. 4. MAGNOLIA APARTMENT OWNER'S ASSOCIATION, MOGNOLIA BLOCK, BRIGADE MILLENNIUM, JP NAGAR, 7TH PHASE, BANGALORE-560 078. REPRESENTED BY MR. K.C.RAMAKRISHNAN, 5. WHITE HOUSE ASSOCIATION, 6TH MAIN, 15TH CROSS, 2ND BLOCK, RT NAGAR, BANGALORE-560 032. REPRESENTED BY MR.RAJENDRA DHINGREJA. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SANKARSHAN JOSHI., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. SHREYAS JAYASIMHA., ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:3242 WP No. 13731 of 2017 AND: 1. BANGALORE WATER SUPPLY & SEWARAGE BOARD ("BWSSB"), 2ND FLOOR, CAUVERY BHAVAN, KG ROAD, BANGALORE-560 009. REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN. 2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA VIDHANA SOUDHA, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560 001. REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. KEMPANNA., ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. MAHANTESH SHETTAR., AGA FOR R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Sankarshan Joshi., counsel on behalf of Sri.Shreyas Jayasimha., for the petitioners, Sri.Kempanna., counsel for respondent No.1 and Sri.Mahantesh Shettar., AGA for respondent No.2 have appeared in person. Counsel for the petitioners submits that the Writ Petition may be dismissed as having become infructuous. When queried, counsel Sri.Sankarshan Joshi., submits that a conscious decision is taken by the advocate on record - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:3242 WP No. 13731 of 2017 and the petitioners about infructuous of the petition and if an order is passed, they shall not seek for recalling the same or file a review petition. The oral submission made by counsel for the petitioners is placed on record. The Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 3 Sl No.: 16