Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:49476 Court No. - 12 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 4964 of 2025 Applicant :- Suresh Kumar Maurya Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Pravin Singh,Ali Moid,Mohd Jishan,Ravindra Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State as well as perused the record. The present bail application has been filed by accused-applicant seeking bail in Case Crime No.93 of 2025, under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2), 111 BNS, P.S. Mohanganj, District Amethi. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that name of the applicant has surfaced in the confessional statement of the co- accused Dileep Kumar Singh who has been granted bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 25.06.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.4614 of 2025. The role assigned to the present applicant is of running a Computer Training Centre which is used in preparing the forged Aadhaar Card. The other co-accused persons namely, Dinesh Kumar Pasi, Anil, Ved Narayan Pandey, Lavkush R Gautam and Ashwani Tiwari have also been granted bail by Co-ordinate Benches of this Court vide orders dated 08.07.2025, 16.06.2025, 13.06.2025, 29.05.2025& 29.05.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application Nos.6154 of 2025, 5387 of 2025, 5271 of 2025, 4809 of 2025 & 4713 of 2025 respectively. The charge-sheet in the case has been filed. Applicant has no criminal history. He submits that the applicant is in jail since 10.04.2025. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer however, does not dispute it is a case of parity. On due consideration to the submissions advanced, perusal of the record as also the fact that the applicant is languishing in jail since 10.04.2025, applicant has no criminal history, bail orders of aforesaid co-accused persons to which applicant seeks parity and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, I find it to be a fit case for enlarging the applicant on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. Let the applicant Suresh Kumar Maurya be released on bail in aforesaid case crime number subject to his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court concerned with the following conditions: (i) The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial. (ii) The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness. (iii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (iv) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law. (v) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Panel Code (now Section 269 of BNS). (vi) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. (now Section 84 BNSS) is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Panel Code (now Section 209 BNS). Order Date :- 22.8.2025 Saurabh Yadav/- Digitally signed by :- SAURABH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench