HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 2495 of 2016 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE ABDHESH KUMAR CHAUDHARY, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned State counsel for the opposite party nos. 1, 2 and 4, as well as Shri Ran Vijai Singh, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 3/The District Basic Education Officer, Sambhal, and gone through the record. 2. The petitioners have filed the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, claiming themselves to be working as Class-IV employees in Junior High School, Saidpur, Nibola, District Sambhal. 3. Apparently the petitioners are aggrieved by the inaction of the respondents with respect to creation of post of Class-IV employees in the Junior High Schools as a result of which they are not getting their salaries despite specific order dated 30th October, 2012 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.2690 (S/S) of 2005. 4. Although multiple prayers have been made in the present writ petition, however, during the course of hearing the learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners would be satisfied, in case a direction in the nature to decide the representation dated 15.12.2015 of the petitioners (a copy of which has been annexed as Annexure-6 to the writ petition) may be directed to be decided in a time-bound manner. 5. Learned counsel for the respondents, especially respondent no. 3, have no objection to the aforesaid innocuous prayer made by the petitioners. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Yogendra Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mukund Madhava Asthana, Ran Vijay Singh Leeladhar Mathur And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Secy.Govt.Of U.P. Basic Edu.Deptt.And Ors. .....Respondent(s) 6. In view of the innocuous prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, it is directed that the representation dated 15.12.2015 preferred by the petitioners (a copy of which has been annexed as Annexure-6 to the writ petition) be decided by the respondent no. 3 (The District Basic Education Officer, Sambhal) within a period of five weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is served upon the opposite party no. 3. Needless to say, the respondent no. 3 shall pass a speaking and reasoned order and provide an opportunity to the petitioners, in case they want to rely on any other document, keeping in view that the matter has been pending since the year 2016. 7. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits or legality of the issue in the present writ petition, which shall be guided by its own facts & circumstances. 8. With the aforesaid observation/direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. October 8, 2025 MVS/- WRIA No. 2495 of 2016 2 (Abdhesh Kumar Chaudhary,J.) Digitally signed by :- MANOJ VIKRAM SINGH CHAUHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- MANOJ VIKRAM SINGH CHAUHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- MANOJ VIKRAM SINGH CHAUHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench