Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
12.03.2025 Item No.17 Ct. No. 26 CHC Rejected
C.R.M.(A) 876 of 2025
In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with Mallarpur Police Station Case No. 21 of 2025 dated 21.01.2025 under Section 135(1)(a) of the Electricity Act, 2003 and Amendment Act, 2007. And
In the matter of : Sk. Jahangir Alam ...… petitioner
Mr. Tapas Kumar Ghosh, Advocate Mr. Tanmay Chowdhury, Advocate .…for the petitioner
Mr. Shiladitya Banerjee, Advocate Mrs. Atulya Sinha, Advocate .…for the State
Mr. Aniket Mitra, Advocate
…for the WBSEDCL
1. Materials in the Case Diary suggest that, petitioner is involved in theft of electricity. Enlarging the petitioner on anticipatory bail will be inimical to the investigation as also will send a wrong signal to the society.
2. In such circumstances, we are unable to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
3. This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, rejected.
(Debangsu Basak, J.)
(Smita Das De, J.)
2