Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14279 (KAR)

CHATHRADA NARAYANAPPA v. SRI MUNISWAMY

WP/12051/2018 · 2025-01-08

Lalitha Kanneganti

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:467 WP No. 12051 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 12051 OF 2018 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: CHATHRADA NARAYANAPPA S/O LATE MUNIVENKATAPPA AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS R/A RAJKRISHNAPURA ALAMBADI POST, MALUR TALUK KOLR DISTRICT …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RASHEED KHAN, ADVOCATE- ABSENT) AND: 1. SRI MUNISWAMY S/O MUNIVENKATAPPA R/A NO.255, NEW THIPPASANDRA HAL 2ND STAGE SEETHAPPA COLONY BANGALORE-560 075 2. SRI K.B.KAKANI SINCE DECEASED HIS LRS 2A. KAMAL KISHORE KAKANI THE DIRECTOR OF INDIAN TIN INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD., R/A NO.46, CUBBON ROAD BANGALORE-560 001 2B. GOVIND NARAYAN KAKANI THE DIECTOR OF INDIAN TIN INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD., R/A NO.15-7-322 BEGUM BAZAR HYDERABAD AANDHRA PRADESH-500 012 2C. BADRI NARAYAN SAMPATH THE DIRECTOR OF INDIAN Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:467 WP No. 12051 of 2018 TIN INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD., R/A NO.8/16 1ST MAIN ROAD VYALIKAVAL EXTENSION BANGALORE-560 003 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.SRINIVASA MURTHY, ADVOCATE FOR R2- ABSENT SRI.H.R.ANANTHA KRISHNAMURTHY, ADVOCATE FOR R2A R2(B) AND R2(C) ARE SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER, DATED: 21.03.2017 PASSED ON I.A.NO.2 AND 3 BY THE HON'BLE CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE MAYO HALL UNIT AT BANGALORE IN O.S.NO.27123/2011 VIDE ANNEXURE-F. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ‘DISMISSAL’, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI ORAL ORDER This writ petition is of the year 2018. Even till today, the process is not completed. The matter is listed before this Court for orders. On 06.01.2025, as there was no representation on behalf of both the parties, this matter was directed to be listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. 2. Today also there is no representation on behalf of both the parties. It appears that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the matter. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:467 WP No. 12051 of 2018 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE BN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6