[2025:RJ-JP:15419] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4680/2025 Chaman S/o Pannalal, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Nayako Ka Mohalla Sarwadi Gate Old City Kishangarh, Police Station -Kishangarh, District Ajmer. (Presently Confined In Central Jail Ajmer). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Nikitha Bhandari For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Poonia, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 07/04/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.350/2024 registered at Police Station Madanganj, District Ajmer for the offence(s) under Sections 331(4) and 305(a) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the petitioner could not marked his presence before the concerned SHO as per the order dated 21.01.2025 passed by this Court by which the petitioner was enlarged on bail. The learned Trial Court after obtaining the report from the concerned SHO dismissed the bail application of the petitioner. The accused-petitioner is in custody since long and trial of the case [2025:RJ-JP:15419] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-4680/2025] may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and contended that the accused-petitioner has breached the conditions of bail and did not marked his presence before the concerned SHO on 25.02.2025, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be dismissed. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. The accused-petitioner despite having criminal antecedents was enlarged on bail by this Court with a conditions that accused petitioner shall mark his presence on 25th of every month till conclusion of the trial before the concerned police station. The accused-petitioner has not adhered with the conditions mentioned in the bail order passed by this Court, therefore, considering the above facts, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the accused- petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application of the accused-petitioner is hereby, dismissed. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/23