Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 142734 (ALL)

SONI DEVI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPTT. U.P. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/6499/2025 · 2025-05-30

Rajesh Singh Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:34141 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6499 of 2025 Petitioner :- Soni Devi Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Urban Development Deptt. U.P. Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Deepti Gupta Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ravi Singh Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. By means of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding to the Opposite Party No. 2 and 3 to consider the appointment of petitioner under U.P. Recruitment of Dependents of Government Servants Dying in Harness Rules, 1974 as the application for appointment of petitioner is pending since 17.03.2025 (contained as Annexure No. 1) within stipulated period of time, in the interest of justice." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is ready to prefer a fresh representation to the Competent Authority, therefore, he may be permitted to prefer a fresh representation to the opposite party No. 2, i.e., Municipal Commissioner, Nagar Nigam, Ayodhya, U.P. and a direction may be issued to him to consider and decide the said representation of the petitioner with expedition. 4. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection if direction for disposal of the said representation is issued. 5. Therefore, in view of the above, without entering into merits of the issue, I hereby dispose of this petition finally at the admission stage giving liberty to the petitioner to prefer a fresh representation to the opposite party No. 2, i.e., Municipal Commissioner, Nagar Nigam, Ayodhya, U.P. ventilating his grievance taking all pleas and grounds which are available with him enclosing therewith the copy of his earlier representation, if any, which are necessary for disposal of the representation within a period of fifteen days from today and if such representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and dispose of the same strictly, by speaking and reasoned order in accordance with law after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, if it is so required, with expedition preferably, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and the decision thereof shall be intimated to the petitioner forthwith. 6. 6. This writ petition is disposed of, in view of the aforesaid terms. Order Date :- 30.5.2025 Anurag Digitally signed by :- ANURAG SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench