JAGDAMBA PRATAP NARAYAN SINGH ALIAS JAGDAMBA PRASAD AND 4 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. DEPTT. OF BASIC EDUCATION LKO. AND 5 OTHERS
WRIA/6154/2025 · 2025-05-30
Rajesh Singh Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 142723 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 142723 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:34003 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6154 of 2025 Petitioner :- Jagdamba Pratap Narayan Singh Alias Jagdamba Prasad And 4 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Of Basic Education Lko. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- P.K. Mishra,Vivek Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.
1. Heard Sri P.K. Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Pradeep Kumar Singh, learned Addl. Chief Standing Counsel for the State-opposite parties no.1 to 4. 2. In view of the proposed order, notices to opposite parties no.5 & 6 are hereby dispensed with. 3. By means of this petition, the petitioners have prayed following main reliefs:-
"(i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, commanding the opposite parties not to reduce the salary of the petitioner as proposed in the pay bills of the month of April, 2025 as contained in Annexure4 No. 1 to this writ petition, in the interest of justice. (ii) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, commanding the opposite parties to pay salary of Rs. 92,583/- already fixed regularly to the petitioners."
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that for redressal of the aforesaid grievance, the petitioners have preferred representation to the competent authority, but to no avail. Learned counsel for the petitioners has also submitted that the petitioners may be permitted to prefer fresh separate representations before opposite party no.3 and this Court may direct opposite party no.3 to pass appropriate order strictly in accordance with law. 5. Learned counsel for the opposite parties has no objection if direction for disposal of the representation is issued. 6. Therefore, without entering into merits of the issue, the petitioners are permitted to prefer fresh separate representations to opposite party no.3 i.e. District Basic Education Officer, Ambedkar Nagar taking all pleas and grounds, which are
necessary for disposal of the representation and also enclosing the earlier representation, if any, alongwith certified copy of this order within a period of fifteen days from today.
If such representation is preferred by the petitioners within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and dispose of the aforesaid representation of the petitioners by speaking and reasoned order, strictly in accordance with law, with expedition, say within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the representation and thereafter communicate the decision thereof to the petitioners forthwith. 7. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of finally. [Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.] Order Date :- 30.5.2025 RBS/- Digitally signed by :- RAM BIR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench