Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:34096 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6155 of 2025 Petitioner :- Madhav Prasad Respondent :- General Manager /Secy. /Chief Executive Officer Distt. Co-Operative Bank Ltd. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Ujagir Verma,Sachin Verma Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. In view of the proposed order, notices to opposite parties are hereby dispensed with. 3. By means of this petition, the petitioner has prayed following main relief:- "a) a writ order or directions in the nature of Mandmamus commanding and directing the opp. parties to pay the due amount Rs.3,65,844.21 with 18% interest from 29.02.2016 till payment of the aforesaid dues and also pay the increment, which is entitle the petitioner." 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that for redressal of the aforesaid grievance, the petitioner has preferred representation to the competent authority, but to no avail. Learned counsel for the petitioner has also submitted that the petitioner may be permitted to prefer a fresh representation before opposite party no.1 and this Court may direct opposite party no.1 to pass appropriate order strictly in accordance with law. 5. Therefore, without entering into merits of the issue, the petitioner is permitted to prefer a fresh representation to opposite party no.1 i.e. General Manager/Secretary/ Chief Executive Officer, District Co-operative Bank Limited, District- Sitapur taking all pleas and grounds, which are necessary for disposal of the representation and also enclosing the earlier representation, if any, alongwith certified copy of this order within a period of fifteen days from today. If such representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and dispose of the aforesaid representation of the petitioner by speaking and reasoned order, strictly in accordance with law, with expedition, say within a period of two months from the date of receipt of the representation and thereafter communicate the decision thereof to the petitioner forthwith. 6. It is needless to say that if there is no legal impediment in making payment to the petitioner, which has been prayed in the writ petition, the same may be paid to the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time and if there is unexplained delay, the petitioner may be entitled for the interest on the delayed payment and that claim too may be considered strictly in accordance with law. 7. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition is disposed of finally. [Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.] Order Date :- 30.5.2025 RBS/- Digitally signed by :- RAM BIR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench