KHADIM HUSSAIN AND ANR. (LADAKH CASE) v. SHASHI KANT BAGAT AND ANR. (LAW AND JUSTICE)
CCP(S)/99/2025 · 2026-08-10
Sanjay Dhar
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1427 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1427 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No. 76 Regular Cause List.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR *******
CCP(S) 99/2025 in[WP(C) 1270/2022].
KHADIM HUSSAIN AND ANR.
…Petitioner (s)
Through: Mr. Masood Ah, Advocate.
VERSUS
SHASHI KANT BAGAT AND ANR.
Through: Mr. Tahir Majid Shamsi, Dy. Solicitor General of India
with Mr Faizan Ah Ganai, Advocate.
…Respondent(s)
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE.
ORDER 10-08-2026
01.
Through the medium of the present petition, the petitioners are seeking implementation of order dated 4th of July 2024 passed by the Writ Court, whereby the respondents were directed to consider the claim of the petitioners in accordance with law.
02.
Statement of Facts stands filed by the respondents. As per the Statement of Facts, the respondents have considered the claim of the petitioners and rejected the same in terms of Order dated 9th of April 2025. A copy of the
Consideration Order has been placed on record.
03.
In view of the fact that the respondents have already passed a
Consideration Order, the order passed by the Writ Court stands complied with. The contempt petitions are, accordingly, closed.
04.
If at all the petitioners have any grievance against the Consideration
Order passed by the respondents, they are at liberty to challenge the same by way of appropriate proceedings.
05.
The contempt petition stands disposed of.
(Sanjay Dhar)
Judge
SRINAGAR 10-08-2026 Showkat Khan