ANAND KUMAR YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/4606/2025 · 2025-06-04
Rajnish Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 142660 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 142660 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:34542 Court No. - 11 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 4606 of 2025 Applicant :- Anand Kumar Yadav Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Nishant Srivastava,Vivek Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J.
1. Heard Shri Razwanul Haq Ansari, Advocate holding brief of Shri Nishant Srivastava, learned counsel for applicant, Mr. Badarul Hassan, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material available on record.
2. By means of this application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (482 Cr.P.C.), the applicant has sought following prayer:-
"to quash revisional order dated 07.04.2025 passed by learned Additional District & Sessions Judge, Room No. 3, Gonda in Criminal Revision No. 130 of 2024 as well as cognizance order dated 21.12.2023 passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gonda in Case No. 806 of 2023, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 506 IPC, Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Gonda as well as impugned charge sheet dated 20.11.2023 submitted by the Investigating Officer in the aforesaid case."
3. Admittedly the two sale deeds dated 30.10.2019 and 18.10.2022 have been executed by the applicant along with his mother. The plea taken by the applicant is that the subsequent sale deed was not executed by the applicant and in the garb of power of attorney, which the applicant wanted to execute one Awadesh got the sale deed executed which cannot be believed because as admitted by learned counsel for applicant that the applicant is a Teacher in a Government School.
4. In view of above, this application is misconceived and liable
to be dismissed.
5. At this stage, learned counsel for applicant submits that this application may be dismissed as not pressed so that he may move application for discharge. To which learned A.G.A. for the State has no objection.
6. In view of above, the application is dismissed accordingly. . (Rajnish Kumar, J.) Order Date :- 4.6.2025 Virendra Digitally signed by :- VIRENDRA KUMAR GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench