Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:33973-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 5217 of 2025 Petitioner :- Amit Kumar Pandey Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Urban Planning And Housing Development And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Santosh Kumar Misra,Pramod Kumar Pandey,Sanjay Kumar Verma,Vrishank Pathak Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ratnesh Chandra Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. 1. Heard. 2. The petitioner has sold off part of minjumla gata to Avas Vikas Parishad. A dispute arose as to the entitlement of the petitioner over the land in question. An application was submitted by the petitioner- Amit Kumar Pandey to the Executive Engineer, U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad, Ayodhya on 22.11.2021 that the undisputed amount be paid and the remaining amount pertaining to the disputed land be retained. 3. As informed by Shri Ratnesh Chandra, learned counsel for U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad, Ayodhya who has placed before us the said application which has been shown to Shri Santosh Kumar Misra, learned counsel for the petitioner, who admits to having submitted such application though it has not been filed with the writ petition. The application dated 22.11.2021 is taken on record. 4. Based on aforesaid, an amount of Rs.4,91,27,460/- has been paid to the petitioner on 27.11.2021. Now the remaining amount of sale consideration is not being paid because of pending litigation in respect of the remaining land of minjumla gata at the behest of opposite party no.6. This is purely a civil dispute which cannot be adjudicated under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner is at liberty to avail other remedies, as may be prescribed in law, especially in view of the letter dated 22.11.2021. 5. The writ petition is disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. (Om Prakash Shukla, J.)(Rajan Roy, J.) Order Date :- 30.5.2025 Arnima Digitally signed by :- ARNIMA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench