AWANISH KUMAR AGARWAL AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIC/5172/2025 · 2025-05-30
Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 142631 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 142631 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:33917-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 5172 of 2025 Petitioner :- Awanish Kumar Agarwal And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rahul Kumar Shukla,Mohit Singh,Shivam Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. Heard. The petitioner has initiated some proceedings for execution of the order dated 29.11.2003 passed by the Consolidation Officer under Section 42-A of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act,
1953. The said order was passed 10.06.2005, and thereafter, some other orders have been passed on 11.11.2024 &
14.11.2024. However, in the meantime, one of the persons who was affected has challenged the order dated 29.11.2003 by filing a revision bearing Computerized Case No. 202454081500000551 recently in December, 2024 before the D.D.C., Bahraich. Looking into the facts of the case, the D.D.C., Bahraich is
directed to decide the aforesaid revision including its maintainability etc. positively within a period of six weeks, as the petitioner has also put in appearance. Subject to the aforesaid, if no relief is granted to the client of Shri Ashish Raman Mishra, namely, Zahida Begum, then the opposite parties would be obliged to implement the orders passed by the Consolidation authorities, unless there is any legal impediment. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of.
Order Date :- 30.5.2025 Lokesh Kumar [Om Prakash Shukla, J.] [Rajan Roy, J.] Digitally signed by :- LOKESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench