Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 14263 (KAR)

MR SYED RIZWAN v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

WP/1950/2021 · 2025-01-10

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:1040 WP No. 1950 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 1950 OF 2021 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: MR. SYED RIZWAN AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, S/O SYED AMJAD., R/O NO.465, RAMNAGAR AND SAGAR-577 401. PRESENT MANAGING COMMITTEE OF KHABRASTAN HAZRATH GANJ BAKABLI, SHAHWALI ALLAH, HAZRATH SYED KHADIR SHAHWALI, ALLAH YELAR GALALE SAGAR TALUK, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. TAJUDDIN., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT, SHIVAMOGGA-577 201. 2. TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, SAGAR TOWN-577 401. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MANJUNATHA RAYAPPA., AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:1040 WP No. 1950 of 2021 ORAL ORDER Sri.Manjunatha Rayappa., AGA for the respondents has appeared in person. 2. The captioned Writ Petition is filed seeking a Writ of Certiorari to quash the Notice dated 22.05.2020 issued by the Tahsildar, Sagar - the second respondent in ¸ÀASÉå: J£ï.¹.Dgï/¹Dgï/321/19-20 vide Annexure-A. 3. Heard the arguments and perused the writ papers with care. 4. Suffice it to note that the petitioner has called into question the notice issued by the Tahsildar, Sagar. It is only a notice. If at all the petitioner has any grievance, he can suitably reply to the same. Hence, I decline to interfere with the said notice. The Writ Petition is devoid of merits and is liable to be dismissed. 5. Resultantly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 3 Sl No.: 20