M/S GIRI LAL JAIN AND SONS,AYODHYA THRU. PROPRIETOR DINESH CHANDRA JAIN,(GSTIN 09AFGPJ5114F1ZP) v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. TAX AND REGISTRATION,LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WTAX/518/2025 · 2025-05-28
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 142620 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 142620 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:32200 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 518 of 2025 Petitioner :- M/S Giri Lal Jain And Sons,Ayodhya Thru. Proprietor Dinesh Chandra Jain,(Gstin 09afgpj5114f1zp) Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Tax And Registration,Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Utkarsh Misra,Abhishek,Ashish Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State.
2. Present petition has been filed challenging the order dated 12.03.2024 whereby, the registration of the petitioner was cancelled as well as the order dated 08.05.2025 whereby the appeal was dismissed as being beyond limitation.
3. The neat contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that there is no application of mind while passing the order of cancellation.
4. Considering and adopting the reasoning as contained in the
judgment and order passed by this Court in the case of M/s Chandra Sain, Sarda Nagar, Lucknow Thru. Its Proprietor vs U.O.I. and others (Writ Tax No.147 of 2022): decided on 22.09.2022, the impugned orders dated 12.03.2024 and 08.05.2025 are quashed.
5. Matter is remanded to the assessing authority to pass fresh
order after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.
6. Present petition is allowed in above terms.
Order Date :- 28.5.2025 akverma Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench