DR. JAGDAMBA JAISWAL v. THAKUR SHIVNATH JAI THAKUR DWARIKA JI AND THAKUR DAKORJI AND ANR
SCCR/356/2015 · 2025-09-23
Chandra Kumar Rai
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14262 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 14262 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD S.C.C. REVISION No. - 356 of 2015 Court No. - 37 HON'BLE CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J.
1. Heard Mr. Arpit Agarwal, learned counsel for the revisionist and Mr. Yogendra Pati Tripathi, learned counsel for the opposite parties.
2. Mr. Arpit Agarwal, learned counsel for the revisionist submitted that the instant revision has become infructuous.
3. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the revisionist, the instant revision is dismissed as infructuous. September 24, 2025 Rameez Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Arpit Agarwal, C.K.Parekh(Senior Adv.) Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Apoorva Bhatt, Yogendra Pati Tripathi (Chandra Kumar Rai,J.) Dr. Jagdamba Jaiswal .....Revisionist(s) Thakur Shivnath Jai Thakur Dwarika Ji And Thakur Dakorji And Anr .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- RAMEEZ AHMED High Court of Judicature at Allahabad